C-236. Without CEM?

Back and forth, the “bi-ness” path, may not (indeed, has not) been as invigorating as it might have been and ought to be by CEM development. What has then ensued is not step strength, materiality and emergence. Something else, rather. A lot of something else. There is B&F trauma (e.g., partisanry and “no choice” elections). Potentially a killing trauma. As fatal to procedural technologies as physical trauma is to corporate bodies. There is no Forward progress.

What could have been productive partnering in marriage becomes divorce. What could have been happy family becomes sundered. What could have been stimulating conversation comes to naught. What could have been productive civil Union becomes political war. Lots of “might have beens.” That theme, however, we set aside in favor of “It would have helped.”

“Union” expresses the needed functionality and something of an attained functionality; but it misses what “Unite” (an R-word) would point OUT: the required functionality process to obtain functionality.

CEM would Help. What emergence we have, inadequate though it is, we owe to CEM. First re body and step (History), then re the step (Involve CEM Grasp)*, then within the step (Mind CEM Move)*, then within Mind and/or Move (various alloyed mettles) … and the prospect via R-sense procedural tech unlimited.

***

* Compose, the master mettle, comprises both of these. “Double CEM.” Compose points TO a molecular step.


In light of the very useful Search feature now available, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.


(c) 2020 R. F. Carter
S